Statistical Comparison of Melting Iceberg Backscatter Embedded in Sea Ice and Open Water Using RADARSAT-2 Images of the Newfoundland Sea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates and compares polarimetric signatures of icebergs embedded in sea ice and icebergs in open water. The main objective is to study on the backscatter properties of melting iceberg and to check on whether there is any distinguishable property in them in the case of different background clutter conditions (i.e. sea ice and open water). This study results will improve the potential of iceberg detection using radar polarimetry. RADARSAT-2 images have been used for the analysis acquired over locations near the coastline (approximately 3–35 km) of the island of Newfoundland. For analysis, polarimetry parameters, such as co-(HH) and cross-(HV) polarization and several popular decomposition techniques, specifically Pauli, Freeman–Durden, Yamaguchi, Cloud–Pottier, and van Zyl, have been used to determine the polarimetric signatures of icebergs and sea ice. The statistical hypothesis T-test has been applied to achieve a precise comparison among backscatters from different icebergs groups. Statistical results tend to show a dominant surface scattering mechanism for icebergs in all types of clutter conditions. Moreover, icebergs in open water produce larger volume scatter than icebergs in sea ice, whereas icebergs in sea ice produce larger surface scatter than icebergs in open water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".