MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198037554 · doi:10.1101/2021.08.31.458344

The evolutionary origin of host association in an ancient bacterial clade

2021· preprint· en· W3198037554 on OpenAlexaff
Max Emil Schön, Joran Martijn, Julian Vosseberg, Stephan Köstlbacher, Thijs J. G. Ettema

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyObligateGenomeAlphaproteobacteriaRickettsialesEvolutionary biologyHost (biology)CladePhylogeneticsPhylogenomicsGeneticsGeneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The evolution of obligate host-association of bacterial symbionts and pathogens remains poorly understood. The Rickettsiales represent an order of obligate alphaproteobacterial endosymbionts and parasites that infect a wide variety of eukaryotic hosts, including humans, livestock, insects and protists. Induced by their host-associated lifestyle, Rickettsiales genomes have undergone reductive evolution, leading to small, AT-rich genomes with limited metabolic capacities. We describe several genomes of deep-branching, environmental alphaproteobacteria that branch basal to previously sampled Rickettsiales, and whose genome content are reminiscent of free-living and biofilm-associated lifestyles. Ancestral genome content reconstruction across the Rickettsiales tree revealed that the free-living to host-association transition of this group occurred more recently than previously anticipated, and likely involved the repurposing of a type IV secretion system. One-Sentence Summary Deep-branching Rickettsiales provide insights into the evolution of obligate host-associated lifestyle

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesFrench-language works237,207