MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198122683 · doi:10.12957/rmi.2021.58779

‘’Receiving Our Venezuelan Brothers”: understanding responses to displaced venezuelans in Colombia and Brazil (2015-2020) | ‘’Recebendo nossos irmãos venezuelanos”: entendendo respostas para deslocados venezuelanos na Colômbia e no Brasil (2015-2020)

2021· article· en· W3198122683 on OpenAlex
Luiz Felipy dos Santos Costa Leomil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMural Internacional · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Racism, and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceRefugeePopulationPoliticsDevelopment economicsDemographySociologyEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The issue of displaced Venezuelans has been considerably politicized by host governments in Colombia and Brazil, who often refer to this population as their ‘’Venezuelan brothers’’ and frame their response as a compassionate act. Whilst maintaining ‘open door’ policies for this population, Colombia and Brazil have also created pathways to regularize their stay. Nevertheless, only Brazil chose to recognize Venezuelans as refugees. As elucidated in this article, responses to asylum-seekers arriving en masse tend to be impacted by a wide range of determinants at both international and domestic levels. Hence, this article aims to shine a light on the politics of asylum in Colombia and Brazil, looking to understand the factors driving their respective responses to displaced Venezuelans. Keywords: Displaced Venezuelans; Asylum; Colombia; Brazil. RESUMO A questão dos deslocados venezuelanos vem sendo bastante politizada pelos governos receptores Colômbia e Brasil, que corriqueiramente se referem a esta população como seus ‘’irmãos venezuelanos’’ e enquadram suas respostas como um ato solidário. Ao mesmo tempo que mantêm suas fronteiras abertas para esta população, a Colômbia e o Brasil também criaram mecanismos para regularizar a sua permanência. Todavia, apenas o Brasil optou por reconhecer os Venezuelanos como refugiados. Como elucidado neste artigo, respostas a fluxos massivos de refugiados tendem a ser influenciadas por diversos fatores nos níveis doméstico e internacional. Assim, o presente artigo lança luz sobre a política por trás da proteção de refugiados na Colômbia e no Brasil, buscando entender os fatores que influenciam suas respectivas respostas aos deslocados venezuelanos. Palavras-chave: Deslocados Venezuelanos; Refúgio; Colômbia; Brasil. Recebido em: 29 mar. 2021 | Aceito em: 25 ago. 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it