MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Primary Results of the PRONOUNCE Randomized Trial

2021· article· en· W3198154413 on OpenAlexafffund
Renato D. Lópes, Celestia S. Higano, Susan F. Slovin, Adam J. Nelson, Robert Bigelow, Per Settergren Sørensen, Chiara Melloni, Shaun G. Goodman, Christopher P. Evans, Jan Nilsson, Deepak L. Bhatt, Noel W. Clarke, Tine Kold Olesen, Belinda T. Doyle-Olsen, Henriette Kristensen, Lauren Arney, Matthew T. Roe, John H. Alexander, Mirjam Mol-Arts, Samreen Mansor-Lefebvre, Konstantin Zubovskiy, Allan Blemings, Klaus A. Dugi, Gerald S. Bloomfield, Chris Kontos, Adam D DeVore, J. Dedrick Jordan, Brad J. Kolls, J. B. Matthews, Rajendra H. Mehta, Thomas J. Povsic, Michael Morse, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Susan Halabi, Darryl P. Leong, Laurence Klotz, Neil Fleshner, G. Kenneth Jansz, Jonathan Giddens, R. Blair Egerdie, Joseph L. Chin, Joseph Zadra, Richard Casey, Jean Simard, Tamim Niazi, André‐Guy Martin, Marek Babjuk, Jaroslav Hájek, Jiří Klečka, Jiří Kubeš, Jan Schraml, Jitka Jakesova, J Vaňásek, Bohuslav Melichar, Heikki Seikkula, M. Abdiche, Marc Colombel, P. Debourdeau, G. Robert, Arnauld Villers, Guillaume Ploussard, Benjamin Pradère, F. Bruyère, Jean‐Luc Descotes, Idir Ouzaïd, Alexander Winter, Herbert Hanitzsch, H. Sperling, Ralf Eckert, Peter Hammerer, E. Stagge, F. Seseke, Silvio Szymula, Aristotelis Bamias, A. Thanos, Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis, Charalambos Mamoulakis, Haralabos P. Kalofonos, Elżbieta Oszukowska, Katarzyna Madziarska, Jacek Fijuth, Mateusz Obarzanowski, B. Yа. Alekseev, Vagif Atduev, Evgeniy Veliev, A. V. Zyryаnov, С Б Петров, Evgeny Kopyltsov, Vadim Kozlov, Ladislav Macko, J. Dúbravický, Richard Polak, Obaidullah Mir, Marek Vargovcak, I. Minčík, J. Kliment, Frederico Gonçalves, J Mikuláš, Roman Sokol, Michal Korček, Jozef Marko, Viktor Kováčik, Igor Milichovsky, P. Dubinský, J. Michael Lazarus, Sanjay Dixit, Euan Green, Rajaguru Srinivasan, Danish Mazhar, Yeung Ng, Naveed Sarwar, Craig Herman, Frederick Snoy, Robert Given, Ronald Suh, David Lipsitz, James L. Bailen, Lawrence Gervasi, Idalia Acosta, Laurence Belkoff, Ning Wu, Jeffrey A. Frankel, Lawrence I. Karsh, Bryant Poole, David Lieber, Jason Engel, Mohamed Bidair, Steven Rosenberg, Paul Sieber, Adam Perzin, Susan Kalota, Amar Singh, Ralph A. Henderson, Jeffrey D. Wayne, Moben Mirza, Richard D’Anna, Fredrick Wolk, Osvaldo Padron, Kathryn Bylow, Jonathan Rubenstein, Benjamin A. Gartrell, Michael Schwartz, Kalpesh Patel, Ajit Maniam, Thomas E. Keane, Michael Goodman, Charles Bane, Michael Chung, Stephen J. Savage, Edward Uchio, Minh Son Nguyen, William J. Aronson, Rakesh Khanna, Carlton Barnswell

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsAmerican RegentSt. Jude MedicalEsperion TherapeuticsIdorsia PharmaceuticalsDaiichi Sankyo EuropeNational Cancer InstituteServierDuke Clinical Research InstituteAstellas PharmaEisaiCleveland ClinicBristol-Myers SquibbCryoLifeMedicines CompanyRegado BiosciencesNovo NordiskMyoKardiaDaiichi-SankyoAstraZenecaAmarin CorporationIronwood Pharmaceuticals, IncorporatedRegeneron PharmaceuticalsBoston VA Research InstituteBoston Scientific CorporationPfizerYork UniversityEli Lilly and CompanyCSL BehringUniversity of TorontoHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaHLS TherapeuticsGlaxoSmithKlineAmgenSanofiAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerRandomized controlled trialProstateCancerUrologyGynecologyOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The relative cardiovascular safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists compared with GnRH agonists in men with prostate cancer and known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains controversial. Methods: In this international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial, men with prostate cancer and concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive the GnRH antagonist degarelix or the GnRH agonist leuprolide for 12 months. The primary outcome was the time to first adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event (composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) through 12 months. Results: Because of slower-than-projected enrollment and fewer-than-projected primary outcome events, enrollment was stopped before the 900 planned participants were accrued. From May 3, 2016, to April 16, 2020, a total of 545 patients from 113 sites across 12 countries were randomly selected. Baseline characteristics were balanced between study groups. The median age was 73 years, 49.8% had localized prostate cancer; 26.3% had locally advanced disease, and 20.4% had metastatic disease. A major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 15 (5.5%) patients assigned to degarelix and 11 (4.1%) patients assigned to leuprolide (hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.59–2.79]; P =0.53). Conclusions: PRONOUNCE (A Trial Comparing Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease) is the first, international, randomized clinical trial to prospectively compare the cardiovascular safety of a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist in patients with prostate cancer. The study was terminated prematurely because of the smaller than planned number of participants and events, and no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year between patients assigned to degarelix or leuprolide was observed. The relative cardiovascular safety of GnRH antagonists and agonists remains unresolved. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02663908.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207