Le rire : formes et fonctions du comique dans la fiction africaine pour la jeunesse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie les différentes manifestations du comique ainsi que leurs fonctions dans quatre œuvres fictionnelles pour la jeunesse en Afrique : l'album <i>Tout Rond</i> de Fatou Keïta et les romans <i>Les confidences de Médor</i> de Micheline Coulibaly, <i>Pain sucré</i> de Mary Lee Martin-Koné et <i>Awa la petite marchande</i> de Nafissatou Niang Diallo. Il part de l'idée que l'inscription du rire dans la littérature d'enfance et de jeunesse participe de sa dimension didactique, mais produit également une expérience esthétique. À travers l'analyse des rires moqueurs des personnages, il met particulièrement en évidence des conditions dans lesquelles la dérision apparaît légitime, inévitable, excluant l'Autre ou révélatrice de la profondeur du psychisme humain. Abstract: <i>This article examines the different manifestations of the comic and their functions in four African fictional works of children's literature: the picture book</i> Tout Rond <i>by Fatou Keïta and the novels</i> Les confidences de Médor <i>by Micheline Coulibaly</i>, Pain sucré <i>by Mary Lee Martin-Koné, and</i> Awa la petite marchande <i>by Nafissatou Niang Diallo. It stems from the notion that laughter is inscribed into children's and young adult literature for didactic purposes, but that it also produces an aesthetic experience. By analyzing characters' mocking laughter, it highlights the conditions under which derision appears legitimate, inevitable, exclusionary, or revealing of the depths of the human psyche</i>.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".