Land Subsidence in Beijing’s Sub-Administrative Center and Its Relationship with Urban Expansion Inferred from Sentinel-1/2 Observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beijing’s Sub-Administrative Center (BSAC) is located in the South-eastern Beijing Plain, which exhibits severe subsidence. The rapid urban expansion in recent years has aggravated land subsidence and threatens the safe operation of Beijing. First, this study applied the persistent scatterer-interferometric synthetic aperture radar (PS-InSAR) to extract BSAC subsidence time series data. Second, combined with the index-based built-up index (IBI), expansion intensity index (EII), and expansion gradient index (EGI), the spatiotemporal characteristics of urban expansion were retrieved from optical data. Finally, we examined the urban expansion effects on land subsidence at the regional and single-building scales. The results showed that the maximum subsidence velocity in the BSAC reached 121 mm/year from 2015 to 2018, and the urban construction land area increased by 22%. At the regional scale, there existed a positive correlation between land subsidence and EGI or EII. This indicated that urban expansion had a certain impact on land subsidence. Therefore, we further explored the relationship between construction and land subsidence at the single-building scale. The engineering construction effects on land subsidence were divided into three periods, namely, rapid settlement, rebound, and stable periods. Although construction had a significant influence on land subsidence, it did not cause subsidence mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".