MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198210902 · doi:10.1113/jp281942

Naked mole‐rat brain mitochondria tolerate <i>in vitro</i> ischaemia

2021· article· en· W3198210902 on OpenAlexaff
Hang Cheng, Matthew E. Pamenter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIschemiaMitochondrionIn vivoBiologyRedoxRespirationHypoxia (environmental)Brain ischemiaBiochemistryChemistryInternal medicineAnatomyOxygenMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naked mole-rats (NMRs; Heterocephalus glaber) are among the most hypoxia-tolerant mammals. There is evidence that the NMR brain tolerates in vitro hypoxia and NMR brain mitochondria exhibit functional plasticity following in vivo hypoxia; however, if and how these organelles tolerate ischaemia and how ischaemic stress impacts mitochondrial energetics and redox regulation is entirely unknown. We hypothesized that mitochondria fundamentally contribute to in vitro ischaemia resistance in the NMR brain. To test this, we treated NMR and CD-1 mouse cortical brain sheets with an in vitro ischaemic mimic and evaluated mitochondrial respiration capacity and redox regulation following 15 or 30 min of ischaemia or ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R). We found that, relative to mice, the NMR brain largely retains mitochondrial function and redox balance post-ischaemia and I/R. Specifically: (i) ischaemia reduced complex I and II-linked respiration ∼50-70% in mice, vs. ∼20-40% in NMR brain, (ii) NMR but not mouse brain maintained relatively steady respiration control ratios and robust mitochondrial membrane integrity, (iii) electron leakage post-ischaemia was lesser in NMR than mouse brain and NMR brain retained higher coupling efficiency, and (iv) free radical generation during and following ischaemia and I/R was lower from NMR brains than mice. Taken together, our results indicate that NMR brain mitochondria are more tolerant of ischaemia and I/R than mice and retain respiratory capacity while avoiding redox derangements. Overall, these findings support the hypothesis that hypoxia-tolerant NMR brain is also ischaemia-tolerant and suggest that NMRs may be a natural model of ischaemia tolerance in which to investigate evolutionarily derived solutions to ischaemic pathology. KEY POINTS: Ischaemia is highly deleterious to the mammalian brain and this damage is largely mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction. Naked mole-rats are among the most hypoxia-tolerant mammals and their brain tolerates ischaemia ex vivo, but the impact of ischaemia on mitochondrial function is unknown. Naked mole-rat but not mouse brain mitochondria retain respiratory capacity and membrane integrity following ischaemia or ischaemia/reperfusion. Differences in free radical management and respiratory pathway control between species may mediate this tolerance. These results help us understand how natural models of hypoxia tolerance also tolerate ischaemia in the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207