A Proteção social ao segmento idoso no contexto de crise do capital: a realidade do Brasil e da Espanha
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study is to reflect on the social protection to the elderly section in the context of capital crisis, with reference to Brazil and Spain. The study was carried out through a bibliographical and documentary study, data from the United Nations, Brazilian and Spanish legislation. Projections by the United Nations indicate that in the year 2060, 27.3% of the population of developed countries will exceed 65 years, 16.8% in developing countries and indicate that the evolution of aging is different in developed and developing countries. The laws of both countries determine social protection from public policies, programs and social projects already implemented. However, it is not always what is determined in legislation if it is implemented in everyday practice and it is from the question about how the countries are preparing for the constant growth of this segment of the population. It is observed that the scenario is not promising, because in the face of the crisis of capital, monopoly capital seeks new niches for its maintenance and governments resort to measures and budget cuts to fit the financial system, through changes in legislation and of fiscal adjustment measures: flexibilization of labor relations, precariousness of social rights, among them the social security system, reviewing criteria and financing in a neoliberal tendency of fiscal adjustment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it