MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198266201 · doi:10.1111/are.15557

Effects of sea louse chemotherapeutants on early life stages of the spot prawn ( <i>Pandalus platyceros</i> )

2021· article· en· W3198266201 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kate Mill, Charanveer Sahota, Kassia Hayek, Christopher J. Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaculture Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaSimon Fraser University
KeywordsBiologyPrawnFisheryLouseZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salmon aquaculture is among the fastest growing food-producing industries worldwide, growing from 12,000 tonnes in 1980 to over 3.2 million tonnes by 2018 (Asche et al., 2013;; FAO, 2020).Canada is now the fourth largest producer of farmed salmon behind Norway, Scotland and Chile producing over 100,000 tonnes of farmed salmon in 2019 (DFO, 2018a).This industry relies on permeable open net pen structures placed directly into nearshore coastal waters to hold the salmon (Asche et al., 2013).These open net pens are efficient for rearing salmon as the open transfer of seawater provides exposure to natural fluctuations in water conditions such as salinity, temperature, nutrients and dissolved oxygen.Outbreaks of parasitic sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus spp.) are a major issue in open net pen salmon farming worldwide (Costello, 2006;Krkoek et al., 2005).These ectoparasites feed on the host's skin, mucus and underlying tissue, leaving the host fish susceptible to secondary infection and disease (Costello, 2006).Outbreaks of sea lice represent the greatest source of mortality and economic losses to fish farms, causing estimated global losses of $500 million annually, accounting for 6% of product value (Costello, 2009;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquaculture ResearchSame topicAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFrench-language works237,207