MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198414654 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.202066

Problems in the deployment of machine-learned models in health care

2021· letter· en· W3198414654 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Joseph Cohen, Tianshi Cao, Joseph D. Viviano, Chin‐Wei Huang, Michael Fralick, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Muhammad Mamdani, Russell Greiner, Yoshua Bengio

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)University of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentKey (lock)PsychologyComputer scienceOperations researchEngineeringComputer securitySoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[See related articles at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.202434][1] and [www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.210036][2] KEY POINTS In a companion article, Verma and colleagues discuss how machine-learned solutions can be developed and implemented to support medical decision-making.[1][3] Both

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.049
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.230
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0490.230
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.013
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0140.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207