MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198539112 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109635

Targeted genetic screening in bacteria with a Cas12k-guided transposase

2021· article· en· W3198539112 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Weizhong Chen, Ze-Hui Ren, Na Tang, Guoshi Chai, Hongyuan Zhang, Yifei Zhang, Jiacheng Ma, Zhaowei Wu, Xia Shen, Xingxu Huang, Guan‐Zheng Luo, Quanjiang Ji

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSimon Fraser UniversityHarvard Medical School
KeywordsBiologyTransposable elementGenomeTransposon mutagenesisComputational biologyGenome engineeringTransposaseMutagenesisGeneticsPseudomonas aeruginosaGeneMutantGenome editingBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbes employ sophisticated cellular networks encoded by complex genomes to rapidly adapt to changing environments. High-throughput genome engineering methods are valuable tools for functionally profiling genotype-phenotype relationships and understanding the complexity of cellular networks. However, current methods either rely on special homologous recombination systems and are thus applicable in only limited bacterial species or can generate only nonspecific mutations and thus require extensive subsequent screening. Here, we report a site-specific transposon-assisted genome engineering (STAGE) method that allows high-throughput Cas12k-guided mutagenesis in various microorganisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Exploiting the powerful STAGE technique, we construct a site-specific transposon mutant library that focuses on all possible transcription factors (TFs) in P. aeruginosa, enabling the comprehensive identification of essential genes and antibiotic-resistance-related factors. Given its broad host range activity and easy programmability, this method can be widely adapted to diverse microbial species for rapid genome engineering and strain evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207