MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198608556 · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i25.7593

Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion following treatment with infliximab: A case report and literature review

2021· article· en· W3198608556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Clinical Cases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabPericardial effusionSurgeryInternal medicineTumor necrosis factor alpha

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agent that is widely used for the management of a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, including Crohn's disease (CD). As a result of its increasing administration, new complications have emerged. Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion, secondary to IFX therapy, is a rare but life-threatening complication. CASE SUMMARY: A 27-year-old man was diagnosed with CD (Montreal A2L3B1) 6 years prior. After failing to respond to mesalazine and methylprednisolone, he took the first dose of IFX 300 mg based on his weight (60 kg, dose 5 mg/kg) on December 3, 2018. He responded well to this therapy. However, on January 21, 2019, 1 wk after the third injection, he suddenly developed dyspnea, fever, and worsening weakness and was admitted to our hospital. On admission, computed tomography scan of the chest revealed a large pericardial effusion and a small right-side pleural effusion. An echocardiogram showed a large pericardial effusion and normal left ventricular function. Then successful ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis was performed and 600 mL hemorrhagic fluid was drained. There was no evidence of infection and the concentrations of TNF-α, IFX, and anti-IFX antibody were 7.09 pg/mL (reference range < 8.1 pg/mL), < 0.4 μg/mL (> 1.0 μg/mL), and 373 ng/mL (< 30 ng/mL), respectively. As the IFX instruction manual for injection does mention pericardial effusion as a rare adverse reaction (≥ 1/10000, < 1/1000), so we discontinued the IFX. Monitoring of the patient's echocardiogram for 2 mo without IFX therapy showed no recurrence of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion. Follow-up visits and examinations every 3 to 6 mo until April 2021 showed no recurrence of CD or pericardial effusion. CONCLUSION: This is a case of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion following treatment with IFX. It is a rare but life-threatening complication of IFX. Early recognition helps prevent the occurrence of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion and minimize the impact on the natural evolution of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it