MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198617850 · doi:10.1161/hyp.78.suppl_1.52

Abstract 52: KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Guideline Update On The Management Of Blood Pressure In Chronic Kidney Disease: What’s New And What’s Different From Other Guidelines

2021· article· en· W3198617850 on OpenAlexaff
Alfred K. Cheung, Tara I. Chang, William C. Cushman, Susan L. Furth, Fan Fan Hou, Joachim H. Ix, Greg Knoll, Paul Muntner, Roberto Pecoits‐Filho, Mark J. Sarnak, Sheldon W. Tobe, Charles Tomson, Johannes F.E. Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineMedicineKidney diseaseObservational studyPsychological interventionAlbuminuriaBlood pressureSystematic reviewIntensive care medicineDiabetes mellitusDialysisMEDLINEInternal medicinePhysical therapyPathologyEndocrinologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In 2012, KDIGO released a guideline on BP management in CKD not receiving dialysis. The emergence of new trials and meta-analyses coupled with wider recognition of the importance of standardized BP measurement protocols have prompted a call to update the 2012 guideline. This summary will outline the changes to the prior recommendations and highlight similarities to guidelines from ACC/AHA and ESC/ESH. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken to formally assess the following issues: 1) BP measurement; 2) lifestyle interventions; BP management in 3) patients with CKD, with and without diabetes, 4) kidney transplant recipients, and 5) children with CKD. Results: A total of 6863 citations were screened. Of these, 290 RCTs, 14 observational studies, and 35 systematic reviews were included in the evidence review. A major addition to the KDIGO 2021 guideline is a chapter devoted to BP measurement. KDIGO recommends the use of standardized office BP over routine BP. Out-of-office measurements (ABPM, HBPM) can be used to complement standardized readings. This emphasis on standardized office BP measurement is similar to recommendations from ACC/AHA and ESC/ESH. A systolic BP target of <120 mm Hg is suggested; however, the guidance emphasizes that the target is only applicable when BP is measured using standardized office protocols. RASi are the preferred agents for adults with CKD with increased albuminuria. For lifestyle interventions, dietary sodium intake should be limited to <2 g/day, and ≥150 minutes/week of physical activity is recommended. A BP target of <130/80 mm Hg and use of CCB or ARB are preferred in kidney transplant recipients. BP in children with CKD should be guided by 24-hour MAP using ambulatory monitoring, targeting ≤50th percentile for age, sex, and height. Similar to ACC/AHA and ESC/ESH guidelines, KDIGO also encourages shared-decision making between patients and clinicians in the individualization of BP therapy. Conclusions: KDIGO has revised its guideline for BP management in CKD based on a rigorous development process and emerging new evidence underscoring the importance of standardized office BP measurement and a lower systolic BP target of <120 mm Hg for achieving potential cardiovascular, kidney, and mortality benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicRenal and Vascular PathologiesFrench-language works237,207