MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198639837 · doi:10.5152/b-ent.2021.21532

More than a quarter century of cochlear implantations: a retrospective study on 1161 implantations at the Antwerp University Hospital

2021· article· en· W3198639837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Griet Mertens, Anouk Hofkens–Van den Brandt, An Boudewyns, Ellen Cochet, Paul Govaerts, Marc J. W. Lammers, Vedat Topsakal, Paul Van de Heyning, Olivier M. Vanderveken, Vincent Van Rompaey

Bibliographic record

VenueB-ENT · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Cochlear implantationUniversity hospitalRetrospective cohort studyMedicineArtAudiologyHistoryHearing lossSurgeryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: In this study, we aimed to describe the demographic profile of all 1161 implantations performed in the last 27 years, including sex, (evolution of) age at implantation, side of implantation, and rate of reimbursed cases; to identify the differences between the adult and the pediatric cochlear implant (CI) population; to describe the etiology of hearing loss in the adult and pediatric CI population; and to investigate the number and causes of the re-implantations. Methods: We performed a retrospective demographic analysis of all 1161 cochlear implantations performed at the Antwerp University Hospital between August 1993 and November 2020. Results: The vast majority of the adult population presented with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (89%) of an unknown etiology (52%) and was unilaterally implanted at a median age of 60 years. In the pediatric population with congenital profound hearing loss, the median age at first implantation decreased significantly over time. During the past five years, the median age at first implantation was 12 months or younger for children with congenital hearing loss. A genetic cause was the most common etiology in children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (53%). Of all implantations, 4% were re-implantations. Re-implantations were performed on average ten years after the first implantation, and the most common reason for re-implantation was implant failure (76%). Conclusion: This study described the profile of 1161 adult and pediatric implantations between the start in 1993 and 2020 that were performed at the Antwerp University Hospital in parallel with the evolution of the Belgian reimbursement criteria. Cite this article as: Mertens G, Hofkens–Van den Brandt A, Boudewyns A, et al. More than a quarter century of cochlear implantations: a retrospective study on 1161 implantations at the Antwerp University Hospital. B-ENT 2021; 17(3): 155-63.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueB-ENTSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207