Novel triangle tip‐jet knife increases efficiency in peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aim Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is performed globally for the treatment of achalasia. A newly available endoscopic knife, the triangle tip‐jet (TTJ) (Olympus Triangle TipKnife‐J, KD‐645L), has the capability of knife dissection along with submucosal injection. We aim to present our experience with the TTJ knife in comparison to the conventional TT knife in POEM, with a focus on procedural characteristics including time, efficiency, and the number of instrument exchanges. Methods All patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between March 2016 and March 2020 at a single tertiary academic center were included in the retrospective cohort. Demographic, procedural, and outcomes data were compared. Results Ninety‐two procedures, 48 using the TT knife, and 44 with the TTJ knife were analyzed. Demographic data were similar. Procedure time was reduced using the TTJ knife (87 vs 61 min, P = <0.001) despite similar myotomy lengths (16.5 vs 15.2 cm, P = 0.09). Efficiency was increased in the TTJ group (5.5 vs 4.3 min/cm of procedure, P = 0.005). The number of instrument exchanges (16.7–1.7, P = <0.001) and usage of coagulation forceps decreased (1.7–0.5, P = <0.001). There was no difference in the procedural difficulty (POEM difficulty score [PDS] 2.2 vs 2.4, P = 0.4). Patients with higher procedural difficulty saw a greater improvement in procedural outcomes. Procedural success was high in both groups (96% vs 100%, P = 0.2). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions The use of the TTJ knife increases efficiency during POEM for Achalasia. The total procedure time is decreased by 28–41%, and procedural efficiency is increased by 22–34%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".