AN INTERVENTION TO ENHANCE OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF CHILDREN WITH OBSTETRICAL BRACHIAL PLEXUS PALSY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) have problems with activity and participation, even if they are operated. The study aimed to investigate the intervention's effects to increase the occupational performance (OP) of children with OBPP. Methods: Twenty-nine children with OBPP, aged 4-7 years, participated in this study. The intervention group consisted of six girls and 12 boys, and a control group was composed of eight girls and three boys. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) determined children's OP. The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) was used to evaluate functional capability. All subjects continued their traditional physiotherapy program of 45 minutes every two days. The intervention group participated in an intervention program, consisting of the children and their families' needs, expectations, and therapists' assessment, about OP 40 minutes per day three days per week for three months. Results: The PEDI self-care, mobility, social function, and total scores and COPM-performance and COPM-satisfaction scores significantly increased in the intervention group (p<0.05). PEDI mobility, social function, and total scores significantly improved in the control group (p<0.05, Table 1). There was a significant difference in PEDI self-care (p=0.020) and total scores (p=0.009) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in COPM-performance and COPM-satisfaction scores in the control group (p>0.05). Conclusions: The present study is the first study on OP intervention in children with OBPP. The present study suggests intervening to enhance OP and via assessing using COPM in the children with OBPP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".