Abstract 12: The Role Of Memory Gamma Delta T Cells In Hypertension And Vascular Damage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: We recently demonstrated that γδ T cells participate in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Evidence also suggests that memory T cells may develop during an initial hypertensive episode, sensitizing mice to develop hypertension to further mild hypertensive challenges. However, whether memory γδ T cells develop and play a role in hypertension remains unknown. Our objective is to determine if memory γδ T cells sensitize mice to develop hypertension in response to a mild hypertensive challenge. Methods: Ten-12-week-old C57BL/6J mice were exposed or not to a hypertensive challenge (490 ng/kg/min angiotensin II (Ang II), SC) for two weeks, followed by a two-week washout period, and then infused with a subpressor dose of Ang II (140 ng/kg/min Ang II, SC) for two weeks. Blood pressure was measured via telemetry and central, effector, and resident memory γδ T cells were profiled by flow cytometry. Results: Mice exposed to the first hypertensive challenge had a higher systolic blood pressure than the sham group at the end of the subpressor hypertensive challenge (149±6 vs. 122±3 mmHg, P <0.001). After 14-days of Ang II infusion, effector memory γδ T cells increased 5.2-fold in the mesenteric artery perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT, 1.25±0.37% vs. 0.24±0.12%, P <0.05), and 1.8-fold in the mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN, 1.49±0.03% vs. 0.82±0.15%, P <0.05) compared to sham treated mice. After repeated Ang II infusion, central memory γδ T cells decreased by 57% in the aortic PVAT (6.79±1.46% vs. 15.69±2.87%, P <0.05), and by 22% in the mLN (0.18±0.01% vs. 0.23±0.01%, P <0.05) compared to control mice. Conclusion: An initial exposure to a hypertensive stimulus sensitizes mice to develop hypertension to a subsequent subpressor hypertensive challenge and results in the development of memory γδ T cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".