MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198902389 · doi:10.1111/all.15079

Climate change: A call to action for the United Nations

2021· editorial· en· W3198902389 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kari C. Nadeau, Ioana Agache, Marek Jutel, Isabella Annesi‐Maesano, Mübeccel Akdiş, Vanitha Sampath, Gennaro D’Amato, Lorenzo Cecchi, Claudia Traidl‐Hoffmann, Cezmi A. Akdiş

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCall to actionClimate changeAction (physics)Political scienceMedicineBusinessBiologyEcologyAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades, increased burning of fossil fuels for electricity, heating, and transportation have led to increases in greenhouse gases (eg, carbon dioxide [CO2], methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases) while deforestation and decreased biodiversity have reduced the Earth's ability to remove CO2, the major greenhouse gas emission. Greenhouse gases trap the sun's energy leading to fundamental shifts in the physical and chemical nature of our planet. They also increase global temperatures both on land and in the oceans and increase acidification of the ocean. More than 90% of the warming that happened on the Earth between 1971 and 2010 occurred in the oceans. In the 141 years that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has tracked global heat, the 10 warmest years on record have occurred since 2005.1 The 2020 Annual Climate Report by the NOAA reported that the combined land and ocean temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.08°C per decade since 1880; however, the average rate of increase since 1981 (0.18°C/0.32°F) has been more than twice that rate (0.18°C).1 The oceans, by absorbing the excess CO2, have increased in acidity, which is now around 25% higher than they were during preindustrial times. Increased acidity of rainfall has also been another consequence of global warming.2 These developments are having tremendous effects on the Earth's climate. Rising temperatures have resulted in increased frequency and ferocity of forest fires, dust storms, hurricanes, flooding, heat waves, and droughts.3, 4 Global warming and climate change deleteriously affect many aspects of planetary and human health (Figure 1). Climate change explicitly or implicitly affects key aspects of human health, including allergic and respiratory diseases. Increasing CO2 and global temperatures have been linked to longer duration of pollen season, pollen concentration, and geographical distribution of pollens leading to increased duration and severity of seasonal allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma.5 Higher CO2 levels increase photosynthesis in plants leading to increased production of pollen.6 An association between thunderstorms and asthma, termed thunderstorm asthma, has been observed. During thunderstorms, pollen and/or mold spores are swept up into the clouds, where they are fractured (either by electric charge or by absorption of moisture) into smaller more allergenic fragments.7 In addition, thunderstorms also alter the distribution of these pollen-derived particles making them more concentrated at the ground level. Thunderstorms during the pollen season are linked to increased asthma exacerbations and emergency room visits.8 In November 2016, a catastrophic and deadly thunderstorm asthma epidemic struck Melbourne, Australia, and overwhelmed health services, leading to loss of many lives.9 Wildfires and dust storms increase air pollution and indirectly enhance health risks. Wildfire smoke contains gases, particulate matter, complex hydrocarbons, trace minerals, and several other toxic and carcinogenic compounds. In a study investigating health effects of a 2013 wildfire season in Oregon, USA, a 10 µg/m3 increase in wildfire smoke increased risk of asthma diagnosis.10 A 5-year study in Kuwait found that dust storm events (defined as events with PM10>200 μg/m3) were associated with respiratory disease in children.11 In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, USA, higher fungal counts were recorded indoors and outdoors.12 Higher temperatures and increased CO2 also promote fungal growth. Increased exposure to mold and fungi has been associated with allergic exacerbations. There are three very important meetings planned in 2021 to bring solutions to most of the above-mentioned problems. The UN General Assembly will meet on the 6th of September to tackle the global environmental crisis. The biodiversity summit will take place in Kunming, China on the 11th of October, and the climate conference (COP26) will start on the 31st of October, in Glasgow, UK. These events are critical for initiating collective action in efforts to save Planet Earth and sustain Human Health. With this editorial, we desire to join health professionals worldwide who have already called for rapid action.13-15 It is imperative that these meetings conclude with a unanimous agreement to reduce emissions to net zero in the shortest possible time. Climate action and mitigation strategies to reduce and stabilize greenhouse gases are directed either at reducing greenhouse gas emissions or at storing greenhouse gases in “sinks,” which consist of natural reservoirs, such as forests, oceans, or soil, for absorbing and storing carbon. Another important goal of climate action is to increase resilience by monitoring and preparing for extreme climate events. The Paris Climate Accord represents the world's desire to combat climate change through reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2015, this historic climate agreement was signed by 196 nations. The main aim of this international cooperation is to enforce the global response to climate change by limiting global temperature rise to 2°C above preindustrial levels by the end of the century and to pursue efforts to hinder temperature increase to below 1.5°C.16 However, substantial health burdens and health risks due to climate change may be unavoidable, even if we stay within these limits. Suggestions of proportional reduction of greenhouse gases by all nations have met with resistance from developing countries. There are many ways to compare national responsibility for climate change: current emission rates, cumulative emissions since industrialization, current or historical emissions per capita, or consumption footprints. Greenhouse gas emissions have steadily increased from the time of the industrial revolution, and it is the cumulative effects of these emissions that have led to the global climate change crisis. The uneven national emission contributions to the climate crisis complicate the finding of an effective and equitable solution to global warming. Using this reasoning, developing countries have argued that long-term polluters need to take the larger burden of reducing emissions. The nations that are historically major contributors to climate change should assist and compensate vulnerable nations in their efforts. Although there is still no consensus on the role of individual countries and their responsibility for climate change, some progress has been achieved. Every country that signed up to the Paris Agreement has put forth a nationally determined contribution (NDC) for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by around 2030. These pledges, which are renewed every 5 years, are formulated by the countries based on their own priorities and needs and are non-binding. Currently, 192 parties have submitted their first NDCs.17 However, based on the probability of fulfilling the NDCs, the estimated probability of staying below 2°C of warming by 2100 is only 5%.18 Much stronger action of all stakeholders, from nations to communities to individuals, is necessary to meet the goals of the Paris accord. The evidence of current climate change caused by increased industrialization and human activity is irrefutable. The authors of this editorial strongly suggest that we join and act now to build a healthier planet for the future (Figure 2). We must all strengthen our efforts to create a fairer and healthier world. The accountability and responsibility of the international community, state governments, business leaders, and most importantly, all of the planet Earth's citizens to uphold basic human values and priorities in health care should be consistently reiterated and acted upon. Our consolidated work includes regular monitoring of environmental changes using advanced technologies and scientific research. We can then translate our findings from environmental research into sound policies that can create sustainable solutions for the health of the planet and human health. The power of equitable and democratized artificial intelligence could be harnessed for real-time monitoring, rapid assessment of climate-related events, and deployment of mitigation strategies.19 Early warning systems should be integrated with public communication systems to help communities prepare for hazardous climate-related events. KN has received funding from the NIAID, NHLBI, NIEHS, and FARE; patents pending from the “Mixed allergen composition and methods for using the same”, “Granulocyte-based methods for detecting and monitoring immune system disorders”, “Methods and assays for detecting and quantifying pure subpopulations of white blood cells in immune system disorders”; serves as director of WAO, advisor of Cour Pharma, and national scientific committee member of the INT and NIH; declares financial or non-financial interests with Before Brands, Alladapt, Latitude, IgGenix, Excellergy, Red Tree Ventures, and Phylaxis. IA serves as Associate Editor of Allergy. MJ reports personal fees from ALK-Abello, Allergopharma, Stallergenes, Anergis, Allergy Therapeutics, Circassia, Leti, Biomay, HAL, AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Teva, Vectura, UCB, Takeda, Roche, Janssen, MedImmune, and Chiesi. IAM IAM reports grants, personal fees, and/or other from the European Commission Horizon 2020 Framework Programme and French ANR. She also serves as associate editor of ERJ, IJTLD, CEA, Canadian Respiratory Journal and JEPH. CT-H reports personal fees from Novartis, Lilly pharma, Töpfer GmbH, Bencard, Danone Nutricia, Lancome, L'Oreal. CA reports grants and/or fees from Allergopharma, Idorsia, Swiss National Science Foundation, Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, European Commission Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Cure, Novartis Research Institute, AstraZeneca, SciBase, Sanofi/Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. All other authors have no conflict of interest within the scope of the submitted work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergySame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207