A EVOLUÇÃO DA EDUCAÇÃO NA POLÍCIA MILITAR DO DISTRITO FEDERAL E SUAS IMPLICAÇOES NA LAVRATURA DE AUTOS DE PRISÃO EM FLAGRANTE MILITAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses the matter of Education inside the Military Police of the Federal District (PMDF) under the aspect of schooling. It aims to undertake an analysis of the several changes regarding the educational level required for joining the force, the internal training process dedicated to the candidates and their professional conduct after graduation. The analysis is based on military arrest procedures accomplished by the Control and Correctness Department of the force. Society demands the police activity to be adequate to the law, what reinforces the people claim for a kind of safety conquered by a citizen police. That’s the reason why it’s necessary to establish a parameter between these two factors: the admission with higher education levels and the correct practice of police activity after graduation on the training process. The objective is to identify the relation between the modification of the education level required for joining the force and the quantitative variation in the number of military arrest procedures issued by the internal corrections unit of the institution. This work is based on bibliographical revision on the military criminal field and on the history of teaching and internal control inside the Military Police of the Federal District as well as on a field research undertaken on the force’s Department of Personal Management and Control and Correctness Department. The research proves that, after the insertion of the requisition of an undergraduate degree, there has been a severe reduction on the numbers of military arrest procedures issued by the police. Because of this variable, it’s possible to identify the relation between schooling and the committing of military crimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".