MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198935682 · doi:10.3390/math9182307

Nonlinear Combinational Dynamic Transmission Rate Model and Its Application in Global COVID-19 Epidemic Prediction and Analysis

2021· article· en· W3198935682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaojin Xie, Kangyang Luo, Zhixiang Yin, Guoqiang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)Nonlinear systemStability (learning theory)Computer scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)EconometricsStatisticsMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global disaster, seriously endangering human health and the stability of social order. The purpose of this study is to construct a nonlinear combinational dynamic transmission rate model with automatic selection based on forecasting effective measure (FEM) and support vector regression (SVR) to overcome the shortcomings of the difficulty in accurately estimating the basic infection number R0 and the low accuracy of single model predictions. We apply the model to analyze and predict the COVID-19 outbreak in different countries. First, the discrete values of the dynamic transmission rate are calculated. Second, the prediction abilities of all single models are comprehensively considered, and the best sliding window period is derived. Then, based on FEM, the optimal sub-model is selected, and the prediction results are nonlinearly combined. Finally, a nonlinear combinational dynamic transmission rate model is developed to analyze and predict the COVID-19 epidemic in the United States, Canada, Germany, Italy, France, Spain, South Korea, and Iran in the global pandemic. The experimental results show an the out-of-sample forecasting average error rate lower than 10.07% was achieved by our model, the prediction of COVID-19 epidemic inflection points in most countries shows good agreement with the real data. In addition, our model has good anti-noise ability and stability when dealing with data fluctuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207