MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3198966976 · doi:10.12701/yujm.2021.01389

Playing snakes and ladders with the common fibular nerve on ultrasound after knee dislocation

2021· article· en· W3198966976 on OpenAlexaff
Natan Bensoussan, Mathieu Boudier‐Revéret, Johan Michaud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Yeungnam Medical Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDislocationKnee DislocationUltrasoundAnatomyMedicineMaterials scienceRadiologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the case of a 21-year-old previously healthy varsity rugby athlete with left common fibular nerve (CFN) injury following knee dislocation.She presented to a local hospital with a traumatic knee injury following blunt anterior impact causing posterior dislocation.Immediately, she noted anesthesia of the lateral leg and dorsal foot, and dorsiflexion paralysis.Computed tomography revealed a tibial plateau fracture with 2 mm impaction.Magnetic resonance identified torn anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, a torn lateral collateral ligament, and a grade one medial collateral ligamentous sprain.The fibular nerve was not commented on.Electromyography (EMG) studies confirmed a CFN mononeuropathy.She underwent orthopedic surgery for ligament repair 2 weeks post-injury followed by consultation with a peripheral nerve surgeon.The patient was seen in our musculoskeletal medicine clinic for preoperative ultrasonographic assessment.She had regained partial sensation of the left distal Playing snakes and ladders with the common fibular nerve on ultrasound after knee dislocation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Yeungnam Medical ScienceSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207