Vorticity-based polynomial adaptation for moving and deforming domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel non-dimensional vorticity-based polynomial adaptation indicator for moving and deforming domains using a high-order unstructured spatial discretization . We verify the utility of this approach when applied to the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) form of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations for a range of applications on moving and deforming domains. Specifically, we verify the ALE implementation by performing simulations of an Euler Vortex (EV), and then, illustrate the accuracy and efficiency of the adaptation routine by performing simulations of flow over an oscillating circular cylinder with two different flow settings, dynamic stall of a 2D NACA 0012 airfoil undergoing heaving and pitching motions, shallow dynamic stall of a 3D SD 7003 airfoil undergoing heaving and pitching motions, and flow over a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) composed of two NACA 0012 airfoils. Results demonstrate that the non-dimensional vorticity indicator can track regions of interest, such as vortices and boundary layers, and yields a significant reduction in degrees of freedom when paired with polynomial adaptation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".