Brief electrical nerve stimulation enhances intrinsic repair capacity of the focally demyelinated central nervous system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our lab has shown that brief electrical nerve stimulation (ES) has a dramatic impact on remyelination of lysophosphatidyl choline (LPC)-induced focally demyelinated rat peripheral nerves, while also inducing an axon-protective phenotype and shifting macrophages from a predominantly pro-inflammatory toward a pro-repair phenotype. Whether this same potential exists in the central nervous system is not known. Thus, for proof of principle studies, the peripheral nerve demyelination and ES model was adapted to the central nervous system, whereby a unilateral focal LPC-induced demyelination of the dorsal column at the lumbar enlargement where the sciatic nerve afferents enter was created, so that subsequent ipsilateral sciatic nerve ES results in increased neural activity in the demyelinated axons. Data reveal a robust focal demyelination at 7 days post-LPC injection. Delivery of 1-hour ES at 7 days post-LPC polarizes macrophages/microglia toward a pro-repair phenotype when examined at 14 days post-LPC; results in smaller LPC-associated regions of inflammation compared to non-stimulated controls; results in significantly more cells of the oligodendroglial lineage in the demyelinated region; elevates myelin basic protein levels; and shifts the paranodal protein Caspr along demyelinated axons to a more restricted distribution, consistent with reformation of the paranodes of the nodes of Ranvier. ES also significantly enhanced levels of phosphorylated neurofilaments detected in the zones of demyelination, which has been shown to confer axon protection. Collectively these findings support that strategies that increase neural activity, such as brief electrical stimulation, can be beneficial for promoting intrinsic repair following focal demyelinating insults in demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis. All animal procedures performed were approved by the University of Saskatchewan's Animal Research Ethics Board (protocol# 20090087; last approval date: November 5, 2020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".