MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hygiene in supporting scientific and technological development of the country and sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population (to the 130th anniversary of the Federal Scientific Centre of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman)

2021· article· en· W3199344663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHygiene and Sanitation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMultidisciplinary approachService (business)HygieneHazardQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceBusinessEconomic growthEnvironmental healthMedicineGeographyMarketingEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Historical analysis is extremely important in assessing the development and achievements of scientific schools and scientific centres. This is especially true concerning research centres operated continuously from the end of the 19th century to almost the first quarter of the 21st century, which include the Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene (FSCH), named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing. The purpose of the study is to analyze the results, achievements and prospects for further development of the FSCH as the head multidisciplinary scientific institution of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor). Materials and methods. Expert-analytical, historical research has been carried out. Analysis materials include the main results of the centre’s activities in the historical aspect, scientific achievements of the last quarter of a century, plans, directions for ensuring the scientific and technological development of the country in the field of hygiene and health protection, ensuring the sanitary and epidemiological wellbeing of the country’s population. Results. The main stages of the formation and development of the FSCH are associated with scientific and technological revolutions, technical progress, the development of all sectors of the national economy. The results of scientific research have made it possible to establish the nature and extent of the impact of environmental factors, industrial and educational environment on the health of various groups of the population. At the turn of the century, the FSCH got involved in nanomaterials and nanotechnologies hazard assessment. Fundamental studies of the FSCH made it possible to reveal the modern mechanisms of the formation of biocenoses of the environment of new innovative complexes with an assessment of the health risk, to establish the effect of the components of the formulations on the mutagenicity of pesticides. An assessment of the risk to the population due to the complex intake of pesticides into the body is also given. FSCH effectively participates in the implementation of national projects “Demography”, “Ecology”, “Clean Air”. Conclusion. FSCH contributed to the provision of scientific and technological development of the country and the sanitary and epidemiological wellbeing of various population groups. The development of the FSCH is associated with participation in the implementation of fundamental and exploratory research approved by order of the Government of the Russian Federation, sectoral research programs of Rospotrebnadzor, national projects “Demography”, “Ecology”, “Clean Air”, events of the Decade of Childhood (2018-2027).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it