MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Myocardial injury after gynecologic oncology surgery in septuagenarians and octogenarians: Is there a role for routine postoperative cardiac biomarker monitoring?

2021· article· en· W3199405193 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tharani Anpalagan, Kathy Huang, Maura Marcucci, Sarah Mah, Millie Walker, Vanessa Carlson, Lua Eiriksson, Waldo Jiménez, Clare J. Reade, Julie My Van Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineUnivariate analysisBiomarkerTroponinCohortCoronary artery diseaseDiabetes mellitusTroponin TSurgeryCardiologyMyocardial infarctionMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

220 Background: Accumulating evidence correlates myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS), even when asymptomatic, with increased cardiac and non-cardiac morbidity and mortality. There is no literature on MINS specific to Gynecologic Oncology. We sought to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of MINS in patients aged ≥70. Methods: Elective laparotomies between 01/2016-09/2020 for patients aged≥70 at a tertiary hospital in ON, Canada, were reviewed using prospectively-collected National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data. MINS was defined as peak serum high-sensitivity troponin-T concentration ≥0.04ng/mL within 30 days postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: In this cohort of 258 patients, of 242 (93.8%) who underwent postoperative troponin screening, 40 (16.5%) experienced MINS without exhibiting ischemic symptoms or ECG changes. The diagnosis of MINS led to a prescription or optimization of cardiovascular medications for 35 patients (87.5%). On univariate analysis, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) of 3-5(p = 0.002), history of coronary artery disease (p = 0.003) or insulin-dependent diabetes (p = 0.006), preoperative use of antiplatelets (p = 0.009), beta-blockers (p = 0.02), ACE-inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB)(p = 0.002) and frailty as defined by the NSQIP modified frailty index-5 (p = 0.02), were associated with greater risk of MINS. Factors reflecting surgical complexity including surgical complexity score, operative duration, blood loss and advanced oncologic stage were not predictive. Multivariable analysis using backward selection procedure identified elevated RCRI and preoperative ACE/ARB as significant risk factors (OR 5.93, 95% CI 1.52-24.31, p = 0.01 and OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.18-5.06, p = 0.02). Conclusions: One in 6 patients in our cohort experienced asymptomatic MINS irrespective of surgical complexity. Our analysis highlights a possible opportunity to optimize cardiac risk factors and to potentially improve perioperative patient safety by reducing morbidity. Routine preoperative cardiac risk-stratification and postoperative cardiac biomarkers monitoring should be considered in elderly patients with gynecologic malignancies.[Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→