MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3199543092

Euroazijski ris (Lynx lynx L.) u Hrvatskoj 50 godina nakon njegove reintrodukcije

2021· dissertation· hr· W3199543092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Iva Hunjak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyEcologyEndangered speciesPopulationPredationBiodiversityHabitatBiologyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eurasian lynx is one of the three large carnivores that inhabit the territory of Croatia. They are an important component of biodiversity and are at the top of the food chain of terrestrial ecosystems. The role of predators puts them in conflict with man resulting in the endangerment of these species. One of the most endangered mammals in Croatia is the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx). Today, four species of lynx are known - the Canadian and red-haired lynx that live in North America and the Eurasian and Iberian lynx that live on the European continent. The Eurasian lynx is widespread in the forested hilly and mountainous areas of the Dinarides from the Croatian-Slovenian border in the northwest to the Croatian-Bosnian-Herzegovinian border in the southeast. The Eurasian lynx is the largest species of the lynx genus. It is a specialized predator that feeds exclusively on meat, and the main prey of lynx consists of eventoed ungulates (Capreolus capreolus), deer (Cervus elaphus) and chamois (Rupicarpa rupicarpa). The lynx is a territorial animal that lives a solitary lifestyle that regulates population density. The main habitat factors that determine the distribution of lynx are the availability of food, the coverage of the habitat with vegetation and the degree of human impact. In the last few centuries, a large number of carnivorous species have declined drastically. This situation is a direct or indirect consequence of human activity. Much of the lynx extinction process in Europe occurred by the early 19th century. In the Dinaric lynx population, the main cause of extinction in 19th century Europe was primarily fragmentation and poor feeding conditions in the lynx habitat, and hunting as a factor was probably secondary to the extinction of local populations. In 1973, the lynx population was reintroduced to the Dinarides when 6 individuals from Slovakia were released. The population spread in the direction of the northwest, towards Italy and the Alps, but also towards the southeast, towards Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the 1990s, lynx was present in the southwestern half of Slovenia all the way to the western mountains of Bosnia in the southeast. Today, the lynx population in the Alps and Dinarides is declining and is strictly protected throughout the area. This population is small and isolated, making it vulnerable to factors that can significantly reduce their viability. Since 2017, the international LIFE Lynx project has been implemented in Croatia and Slovenia, the main goal of which is to repair the genetic diversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→