<i>Myxobolus cerebralis</i> establishment and spread: a graphical synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myxobolus cerebralis is the parasite causing whirling disease, which has dramatic ecological impacts due to its potential to cause high mortality in salmonids. The large-scale efforts, necessary to underpin an effective surveillance program, have practical and economic constraints. There is, hence, a clear need for models that can predict the parasite spread. Model development, however, often heavily depends on knowing influential variables and governing mechanisms. We have developed a graphical model for the establishment and spread of M. cerebralis by synthesizing experts’ opinion and empirical studies. First, we conducted a series of workshops with experts to identify variables believed to impact the establishment and spread of the parasite M. cerebralis and visualized their interactions via a directed acyclic graph. Then we refined the graph by incorporating empirical findings from the literature. The final graph’s nodes correspond to variables whose considerable impact on M. cerebralis establishment and spread is either supported by empirical data or confirmed by experts, and the graph’s directed edges represent direct causality or strong correlation. This graphical model facilitates communication and education of whirling disease and provides an empirically driven framework for constructing future models, especially Bayesian networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".