Antifungal and insecticidal activities of rhein derivatives: synthesis, characterization and preliminary structure–activity relationship studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is an urgent need to replace highly polluting pesticides with environmentally friendly green pesticides of high efficiency and low toxicity, because of the growing concern for quality and safety of agricultural products. To discover new pesticides with diverse chemical structures from natural products, a series of rhein derivatives 3a-9b were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their antifungal activity and insecticidal activity. The bioassay showed that some compounds exhibited moderate antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani, but lower activity against the other five pathogens. Surprisingly, most compounds displayed potent insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura and Tetranychus cinnabarinus at a concentration of 2 μmol/mL. In particular, compounds 3a, 5a and 3 b exhibited potent insecticidal activities against S. litura at 72 h, with mortality rates of 100%, 100% and 92.1%, respectively, which were equivalent to that of the insecticide fipronil (100%). Their structure-activity relationships were also discussed. The findings of this experiment provide helpful research ideas for the development of these rhein derivatives as novel natural product-based pesticides in crop protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it