MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199722145 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.122002

Diffuse supernova neutrino background search at Super-Kamiokande

2021· article· en· W3199722145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologyTRIUMFUniversity of Toronto
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie ActionsNarodowe Centrum NaukiMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research Foundation of KoreaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSupernovaNeutrinoPhysicsFlux (metallurgy)Bar (unit)Sensitivity (control systems)Nuclear physicsSuper-KamiokandeParticle physicsEnergy (signal processing)Solar neutrinoNeutrino oscillationAstrophysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have conducted a new search for the diffuse supernova neutrino background (DSNB) flux at Super-Kamiokande (SK), with a $22.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2970\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{kton}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathrm{day}$ exposure from its fourth operational phase IV. With the new analysis we improve on the existing background reduction techniques and systematic uncertainties and take advantage of an improved neutron tagging algorithm to lower the energy threshold compared to the previous phases of SK. This allows for setting the world's most stringent upper limit on the extraterrestrial ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ flux, for neutrino energies below 31.3 MeV. The SK-IV results are combined with the ones from the first three phases of SK to perform a joint analysis using $22.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}5823\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{kton}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathrm{days}$ of data. This analysis has the world's best sensitivity to the DSNB ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ flux, comparable to the predictions from various models. For neutrino energies larger than 17.3 MeV, the new combined 90% CL upper limits on the DSNB ${\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}}_{e}$ flux lie around $2.7\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}2}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\mathrm{sec}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, strongly disfavoring the most optimistic predictions. Finally, potentialities of the gadolinium phase of SK and the future Hyper-Kamiokande experiment are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it