MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3199731933 · doi:10.5194/acp-2021-699

Top-down and bottom-up estimates of anthropogenic methyl bromide emissions from eastern China

2021· article· en· W3199731933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haklim Choi, Mi‐Kyung Park, Paul J. Fraser, Hyeri Park, Sohyeon Geum, Jens Mühle, Jooil Kim, Ian Porter, Peter K. Salameh, Christina M. Harth, B. L. Dunse, Paul B. Krummel, Ray F. Weiss, Simon O’Doherty, Dickon Young, Sunyoung Park

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Australian GovernmentMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research FoundationLa Trobe UniversityCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsMontreal ProtocolEnvironmental scienceFumigationChinaBromidePollutionOzoneOzone layerEnvironmental protectionAtmosphere (unit)Environmental chemistryAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyMeteorologyGeographyChemistryEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Methyl bromide (CH3Br) is a potent ozone-depleting substance (ODS) that has both natural and anthropogenic sources. CH3Br has been used mainly for preplant soil fumigation, post-harvest grain and timber fumigation, and structural fumigation. Most non-quarantine/pre-shipment (non-QPS) uses have been phased-out in 2005 for non-Article 5 (developed) countries and in 2015 for Article 5 (developing) countries under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer; some uses have continued under critical use exemptions (CUEs). Under the Protocol, individual nations are required to report annual data on CH3Br production and consumption for quarantine/pre-shipment (QPS) uses, non-QPS uses and CUEs to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). In this study, we analyzed high precision, in situ measurements of atmospheric concentrations of CH3Br obtained at the Gosan station on Jeju island, Korea, from 2008 to 2019. The background concentrations of CH3Br in the atmosphere at Gosan declined from 8.5 ± 0.8 ppt in 2008 to 7.4 ± 0.6 ppt in 2019 at a rate of −0.13 ± 0.02 ppt yr−1. At Gosan, we also observed periods of persistent concentrations (pollution events) elevated above the decreasing background in continental air masses from China. Statistical back trajectory analyses showed that these pollution events predominantly trace back to CH3Br emissions from eastern China. Using an inter-species correlation (ISC) method with the reference trace species CFC-11 (CCl3F), we estimate anthropogenic CH3Br emissions from eastern China at 4.1 ± 1.3 Gg yr−1 in 2008–2019, approximately 2.9 ± 1.3 Gg yr−1 higher than the bottom-up emission estimates reported to UNEP. Possible non-fumigation CH3Br sources – rapeseed production and biomass burning – were assessed and it was found that the discrepancy is more likely due to unreported or incorrectly reported QPS and non-QPS fumigation uses. These largely-unreported anthropogenic emissions of CH3Br are confined to eastern China and account for 30–40 % of anthropogenic global CH3Br emissions. They are likely due to delays in the introduction of CH3Br alternatives, such as sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), heat, irradiation and a possible lack of industry awareness of the need for regulation of CH3Br production and use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→