Automatic 3D Ultrasound Segmentation of Uterus Using Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On-line segmentation of the uterus can aid effective image-based guidance for precise delivery of dose to the target tissue (the uterocervix) during cervix cancer radiotherapy. 3D ultrasound (US) can be used to image the uterus, however, finding the position of uterine boundary in US images is a challenging task due to large daily positional and shape changes in the uterus, large variation in bladder filling, and the limitations of 3D US images such as low resolution in the elevational direction and imaging aberrations. Previous studies on uterus segmentation mainly focused on developing semi-automatic algorithms where require manual initialization to be done by an expert clinician. Due to limited studies on the automatic 3D uterus segmentation, the aim of the current study was to overcome the need for manual initialization in the semi-automatic algorithms using the recent deep learning-based algorithms. Therefore, we developed 2D UNet-based networks that are trained based on two scenarios. In the first scenario, we trained 3 different networks on each plane (i.e., sagittal, coronal, axial) individually. In the second scenario, our proposed network was trained using all the planes of each 3D volume. Our proposed schematic can overcome the initial manual selection of previous semi-automatic algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".