MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3199753238 · doi:10.1681/asn.2021030382

The Clinical Application of Urine Soluble CD163 in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

2021· article· en· W3199753238 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Moran, Jennifer Scott, Michael R. Clarkson, Niall Conlon, Jean Dunne, Matthew D. Griffin, Tomás P. Griffin, Elizabeth Groarke, John Holian, Conor Judge, Jason Wyse, Kirsty McLoughlin, Paul O’Hara, Matthias Kretzler, Mark A. Little

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesHealth Research BoardWellcome TrustScience Foundation IrelandVasculitis Foundation
KeywordsANCA-Associated VasculitisUrineMedicineVasculitisImmunologyDermatologyInternal medicineUrologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Statement In ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), noninvasive biomarkers of active renal inflammation, such as urinary soluble CD163, are needed for early detection of active disease before irreversible end organ damage occurs. Clinical translation requires a diagnostic-grade assay, prospective assessment of its diagnostic utility in AAV flare, and assessment of its utility in proteinuric states. The authors report use of an accredited, diagnostic-grade assay for urinary soluble CD163, derivation of cutoff values, and application of the assay to a prospective cohort of patients with potential renal vasculitis flare. They found that urinary soluble CD163 displays high precision in separating RV flare from flare mimics. They also observed increased false-positive results in the setting of high-grade proteinuria, which they demonstrated can be effectively corrected by normalization to the urine protein value, thereby restoring diagnostic accuracy. Background Up to 70% of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) develop GN, with 26% progressing to ESKD. Diagnostic-grade and noninvasive tools to detect active renal inflammation are needed. Urinary soluble CD163 (usCD163) is a promising biomarker of active renal vasculitis, but a diagnostic-grade assay, assessment of its utility in prospective diagnosis of renal vasculitis flares, and evaluation of its utility in proteinuric states are needed. Methods We assessed a diagnostic-grade usCD163 assay in ( 1 ) a real-world cohort of 405 patients with AAV and 121 healthy and 488 non-AAV disease controls; ( 2 ) a prospective multicenter study of 84 patients with potential renal vasculitis flare; ( 3 ) a longitudinal multicenter cohort of 65 patients with podocytopathy; and ( 4 ) a cohort of 29 patients with AAV (with or without proteinuria) and ten controls. Results We established a diagnostic reference range, with a cutoff of 250 ng/mmol for active renal vasculitis (area under the curve [AUC], 0.978). Using this cutoff, usCD163 was elevated in renal vasculitis flare (AUC, 0.95) but remained low in flare mimics, such as nonvasculitic AKI. usCD163’s specificity declined in patients with AAV who had nephrotic-range proteinuria and in those with primary podocytopathy, with 62% of patients with nephrotic syndrome displaying a “positive” usCD163. In patients with AAV and significant proteinuria, usCD163 normalization to total urine protein rather than creatinine provided the greatest clinical utility for diagnosing active renal vasculitis. Conclusions usCD163 is elevated in renal vasculitis flare and remains low in flare mimics. Nonspecific protein leakage in nephrotic syndrome elevates usCD163 in the absence of glomerular macrophage infiltration, resulting in false-positive results; this can be corrected with urine protein normalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207