Study on brittleness templates for shale gas reservoirs-A case study of Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin, southern China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differentiating brittle zones from ductile zones in low permeability shale formations is imperative for efficient hydraulic fracturing stimulation. The brittleness index (BI) is used to describe the rock resistance to hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation and measures the ease at which complex fracture networks can be created. In this study, we constructed brittleness templates through the correlation of fundamental rock properties and geomechanical characterization. We then employed the templates to distinguish the brittle, ductile, and brittle-ductile transition zones in the Longmaxi shale gas reservoir, Sichuan Basin of southern China. The approach works in two steps. First, we suggest a new expression for the mineralogical BI by their respective weights based on the analysis of correlation coefficients between mechanical testing and XRD results. Second, we correlate TOC, porosity, pore fluid, natural fractures, and improved BI model with multiple elastic properties to define the brittle, ductile, and transitional zones in the Longmaxi shale gas reservoir of China. Compared with the traditional mineralogy-based BI definition, the improved BI model differentiates the brittle and ductile zones and provides a better sense of the most suitable fracturing regions. Our results show that the brittleness templates, which combine fundamental rock properties, improved BI model, and geomechanical characterization led to identifying favorable zones for hydraulic fracturing and enhanced shale characterization. The proposed brittleness templates’ effectiveness was verified using data from horizontal wells, offset wells, shale gas wells from different origins, laboratory core testing, and seismic inversion of BI across the studied wells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".