At the Heart of Youth’s Access to Justice in the Child Welfare System: The Stakeholders Brought Together (Au cœur de l’accès à la justice des jeunes en protection de la jeunesse : les acteurs rassemblés)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English Abstract: This article is part of a research project on youth’s access to justice that focuses on youth’s participation in legal proceedings in Quebec. The lack of legal and interdisciplinary perspectives in youth protection justified the organization of a round-table discussion in order to address the challenges, experiences and lessons to foster in the Child Welfare System in Quebec. This article presents the key deficiencies that restrict youth’s access to justice as well as lessons to foster intervention in support of children’s rights. The discussions emphasized in particular the need to create a space for dialog between stakeholders. These discussions also considered different pathways to improve access to justice for the youth in Quebec and socio-legal practices. French Abstract: Cet article s’inscrit dans le cadre d’une recherche sur l’acces a la justice des jeunes qui explore la participation des jeunes au systeme quebecois de protection de la jeunesse. Face au manque d’attention flagrant de la communaute scientifique sur cette question, les auteures deciderent d’organiser une table-ronde interdisciplinaire pour discuter des defis, des experiences et des lecons a partager entre les divers acteurs presents sur la scene de la protection de la jeunesse. L’article expose les principales pistes de reflexion emergeant de cette discussion, joignant les lacunes aux ouvertures pour ameliorer l’acces des jeunes a la justice. La necessite flagrante d’offrir des espaces de dialogue entre les differents professionnels du systeme, principalement les intervenants sociaux et judiciaires, se fait toujours plus pressante. Une approche collaborative, intersectionnelle et interdisciplinaire, non seulement centree sur les jeunes mais egalement inclusive des jeunes, semble ainsi se degager tant des echanges de la table-ronde que du peu d’ecrits portant sur le sujet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".