Small-strain shear modulus of calcareous sand under anisotropic consolidation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the small-strain shear modulus of a calcareous sand was investigated by conducting bender element tests on both horizontal and vertical planes. The effects of sample preparation method, stress path and stress history on the developing of void ratio, the parameters in the modified Hardin Equation, and the stiffness anisotropy were examined. The test results show that the moist tamping samples have the least void ratio variation among the five samples. The void ratio recovery in effective horizontal stress [Formula: see text] = 100 kPa tests is higher than that in the effective vertical stress [Formula: see text] = 100 kPa tests. The samples prepared in the dry state have lower stiffness than those prepared in the moisture state, which is not influenced by the anisotropic stress state. The stiffness anisotropy induced by the sample preparation method is significant under anisotropic consolidation. In [Formula: see text] = 100 kPa tests, the stiffness ratios at the end of the unloading stage are lower than the initial values at the loading stage, which is not found in the [Formula: see text] = 100 kPa tests, meaning that the stress history and stress path could affect the stiffness anisotropy and eliminate the impact of fabric anisotropy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".