MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3200176560 · doi:10.1117/12.2597639

On the sensitivity of snow bidirectional reflectance to variations in grain characteristics

2021· article· en· W3200176560 on OpenAlexaff
Petri M. Varsa, Gladimir V. G. Baranoski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowSensitivity (control systems)ReflectivityRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceGeologyOpticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Snow is a ubiquitous natural material that plays an important role in Earth’s climatological system and energy resource budget. Its insular and reflective properties are key factors contributing to the radiation budget of the cryosphere. Due to its prevalence at extreme latitudes, the monitoring of snowpack quantities is often performed via remote observation. These data are acquired using either satellite readings or by fixing instruments to the underside of aircraft. When acquiring data remotely, it is important to account for the angular configuration of the source illumination and the location of the instrument relative to the surface since reflection is affected by the geometry of the observation. In other words, the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) depends on the angle of incidence of the solar illumination and the angle of observation in addition to the wavelength of the incident light. It has been recognized that the granular properties of a snowpack markedly influence its BRDF. Unfortunately, works examining the effects of snow grain characteristics, such as size and facetness, on BRDF outputs are still scarce. Moreover, measured BRDF values from field studies presented in the literature are limited to specific target samples. This further hinders a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of changes in snow characterization parameters on the bidirectional reflectance of snowpack. The measured datasets often do not provide a detailed characterization of the target samples either, which also reduces their usefulness for elucidating these effects. To address these limitations and enhance the current understanding about the sensitivity of snow BRDF to variations in grain characteristics, we have conducted controlled experiments employing a first-principles in silico experimental framework supported by measured data. Our findings unveil the qualitative effects that snow granular properties have on bidirectional reflectance of snowpack, and highlight the importance of accounting for snow granular properties in remote sensing applications. In addition, our in silico experiments provide a high-fidelity assessment of snow BRDF with respect to key wavelengths particularly relevant for remote sensing applications. More broadly, our investigation demonstrates how remote observations of snow-covered terrains can be significantly improved by the correct incorporation of snow grain characteristics into the bidirectional reflectance models used to assess snowpack properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→