Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four cold-hardy apple ( Malusx domesticaBorkh.) rootstocks developed in Quebec, Canada (SJM-15, SJM-189, SJP84-5198, SJP84-5218) were tested for over seven seasons for their horticultural performance under Pacific Northwestern growing conditions in Summerland, British Columbia, Canada. Malling 9 (M.9, strain NAKBT337) and Budagovsky 9 (B.9) were included in the trial as standards of comparison. All trees were budded with ‘Royal Gala’, trained as slender spindles, and drip-irrigated. Tree survival was good for all the rootstocks. After seven years, trees on SJP84-5198 and SJP84-5218 were slightly larger than those on M.9 or B.9, while trees on SJM-189 and SJM-15 were similar to the standards in vigor. All the rootstocks had low amounts of root suckering, particularly SJM-189. Cumulative yield efficiency of the Quebec rootstocks equaled that of B.9 or M.9 after five cropping years. Fruit size was acceptable for all trees, but smallest on B.9 and largest on SJP84-5218. Fruit red color development was especially good for trees propagated on SJM-189. Further testing of these rootstocks is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".