Reliable and Low-Overhead Clustering in LEO Small Satellite Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low earth orbit (LEO) small satellites have attracted great interests in civilian and military applications due to their low cost and high service performance. However, the enormous scale and high dynamism of small satellites pose challenges to network flexibility and scalability. Therefore, the hierarchical satellite network structure is introduced as an effective approach to enhance the satellite network capabilities further. In this regard, small satellites’ clustering is of fundamental importance for designing such a hierarchical structure. Satellite clusters are always prone to instability due to unpredictable link failures and frequent topology changes. In this article, we study the small satellite clustering problem of jointly optimizing the cluster reliability and the network management overhead. A coalition game-theoretic framework is introduced to obtain low computational complexity by adopting the clustering-decision-making process in an automated and fully distributed fashion. A distributed coalition formation algorithm based on the optimization of reliability and management overhead is developed for the clustering problem. Finally, extensive simulations have been conducted, and the results show that our proposed clustering scheme is able to produce better results than the baseline schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".