MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3200450567 · doi:10.11575/prism/39173

Changes in Student Mental Health and Adaptive Functioning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Age Matter

2021· dissertation· en· W3200450567 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Williams

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Mental healthPsychology2019-20 coronavirus outbreakDevelopmental psychologyVirologyClinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of individuals across the globe has been significant. One segment of the Canadian population that may be particularly vulnerable to the impact of the pandemic are adolescents. Due to the developmental tasks and formational experiences that characterize the adolescent period, a growing number of studies have set out to investigate the potential effect that the pandemic may be having on youth, particularly as the pandemic effects pertain to their mental health. Almost a year and a half later, there are questions that still remain unanswered. As such, the current study sought to better understand adolescent mental health and adaptive functioning during this time and to determine whether there are age differences both cross-sectionally and across time. The current study followed a sample of adolescents from four metropolitan school divisions at two time points: September 2020 (N=2397) and December 2020 (N=1689). Participants completed the Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System (BIMAS-2) measure, a 34-item universal screening measure of conduct problems, negative affect, and cognitive/attention difficulties as well as social and academic functioning. To better understand adolescents’ pandemic-related concerns, participants also completed an 11-item COVID-concern scale. Results indicated that, although mental health and COVID-related concerns are increasing and adaptive functioning is decreasing during the first four months of the school year, that adolescents’ experience during COVID-19 differs depending on their age. Older adolescents reported higher negative affect and cognition/attention difficulties while younger adolescents reported higher conduct and academic functioning. Moving forward, these results can help to inform development of programs and strategies for adolescents as they continue to navigate new experiences within the context of COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→