MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200535268 · doi:10.1111/ejn.15454

Abnormal dendritic morphology in the cerebellum of cyclooxygenase‐2 <sup>−</sup> knockin mice

2021· article· en· W3200535268 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashby Kissoondoyal, Ravneet Rai‐Bhogal, Dorota A. Crawford

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neuroscience · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDendritic spineCerebellumAutismBiologyCell biologySomaNeurosciencePsychologyHippocampal formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a bioactive signalling molecule metabolized from the phospholipid membranes by the enzymatic activity of cycloxygenase‐2 (COX‐2). In the developing brain, COX‐2 constitutively regulates the production of PGE2, which is important in neuronal development. However, abnormal COX‐2/PGE2 signalling has been linked to neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). We have previously demonstrated that COX‐2 − ‐KI mice show autism‐related behaviours including social deficits, repetitive behaviours and anxious behaviours. COX‐2‐deficient mice also have deficits in pathways involved in synaptic transmission and dendritic spine formation. In this study, we use a Golgi–COX staining method to examine sex‐dependent differences in dendritic and dendritic spine morphology in neurons of COX‐2 − ‐KI mice cerebellum compared with wild‐type (WT) matched controls at postnatal day 25 (P25). We show that COX‐2 − ‐KI mice have increased dendritic arborization closer to the cell soma and increased dendritic looping. We also observed a sex‐dependent effect of the COX‐2 − ‐KI on dendritic thickness, dendritic spine density, dendritic spine morphology, and the expression of β‐actin and the actin‐binding protein spinophilin. Our findings show that changes in COX‐2/PGE2 signalling lead to impaired morphology of dendrites and dendritic spines in a sex‐dependant manner and may contribute the pathology of the cerebellum seen in individuals with ASD. This study provides further evidence that the COX‐2 − ‐KI mouse model can be used to study a subset of ASD pathologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of NeuroscienceSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207