Effects of Facilitated Emotional Disclosure on Psychological and Cardiovascular Reactivity in Alexithymia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alexithymia, meaning “lack of words for feelings”, is characterized by difficulty identifying and describing emotional experiences as well as increased somatization. These emotional difficulties, which can be exacerbated by social stressors, have been linked to psychopathology and negative health outcomes. Situations that include demand for emotional expression, which can thus increase uncertainty, have been found to increase psychological arousal and alterations in the autonomic nervous system in the individuals with alexithymia. However, most studies to date have not examined the influence of facilitated emotional disclosure, a commonly used therapeutic tool, on psychological and cardiovascular reactivity in individuals with alexithymia. Drawing from research on social facilitation and emotion disclosure, this study examined how increased demands for emotional expression may increase negative emotional and physiological arousal in individuals scoring higher in alexithymia. Using data from a larger study, one hundred forty-one participants with chronic lower back pain engaged in emotional disclosure tasks with differing levels of facilitation after an anger-inducing maze task involving harassment from a confederate. Alexithymia was assessed using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) scores during intake. Changes in negative affect were calculated by subtracting baseline values from post-experimental task reports. Also, blood pressure and heart rate were collected during both the anger-inducing and emotion expression tasks, and compared with baseline averages to obtain a change score. The results show that, in general, alexithymia as measured by TAS-20 was not associated with emotional or cardiovascular reactivity across expression groups. The lack of support for stress reactivity in alexithymia in the context of emotion disclosure demands is considered within the emotional disengagement characteristic of alexithymia as well as the decoupling and the alexithymia-stress model. Future studies to further investigate the cognitive appraisal and cardiovascular markers associated with alexithymia in situations with high emotional demand and perceived low resources as well as assessing task engagement may shed light on our understanding of stress processes and barriers to therapeutic treatments in alexithymia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".