MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200576089 · doi:10.1089/chi.2021.0088

Development and Implementation of a Pilot Integrative Day Hospital Program for Youth with Severe Obesity and Mental Health Issues

2021· article· en· W3200576089 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Dettmer, Seena Grewal, Andrea Regina, Natalie Phung, Cathleen Steinegger, Jill Hamilton, Alène Toulany

Bibliographic record

VenueChildhood Obesity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObesityMental healthDepression (economics)ComorbidityBody mass indexPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Adolescents with severe obesity and comorbid mental health issues are the most resistant to traditional weight management approaches and have poor treatment outcomes. Our objective was to implement and evaluate a pilot day hospital treatment program for adolescents with severe obesity, or risk for severe obesity, and significant mental health comorbidities. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adolescents 12–18 years of age with severe obesity (BMI >99th percentile), or at risk for severe obesity, and comorbid mental health issues. The intervention, focused on healthy lifestyle and mental health support, was implemented within an existing psychiatric day hospital at a pediatric quaternary care hospital. Anthropometric and mental health measures were analyzed pre- and postintervention. Results: Thirty-two adolescents with a mean age of 14.9 years [standard deviation (SD) 1.6] participated in the pilot integrative day hospital program for a mean duration of 5.2 months (SD 2.3). Eleven participants had primary severe obesity and comorbid mental health conditions (obesity subgroup) and 21 participants had primary mental illness and were at risk for obesity (psychiatry subgroup). We did not observe a significant difference between BMI pre- and postprogram among adolescents in both subgroups. In other words, adolescents in both subgroups achieved weight maintenance. Fear in losing control of overeating and/or being seen by others when eating decreased significantly in the obesity subgroup [mean difference (MD) 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27 to 1.71]. There was a significant decrease in participant-reported depression symptom severity, both overall and within program subgroups. Quality-of-life scores of study participants improved significantly within the obesity subgroup (MD −12.31; 95% CI: −21.69 to −2.93), but not within the psychiatry subgroup (MD −6.35; 95% CI: −13.37 to 0.67). Conclusions and Implications: A day hospital model of care may result in weight maintenance, decreased eating concerns, and improved mental health in adolescents with severe obesity or risk for severe obesity, and significant mental health comorbidities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildhood ObesitySame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207