Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1992, la Commission Landry-Downey sur l'excellence en ducation proposait plusieurs rformes ducatives au Nouveau-Brunswick. Pour les facults d'ducation de la province, une recommandation proposait que tous les diplms et les diplmes des programmes en ducation aient l'quivalent de deux baccalaurats, l'un refltant la formation pdagogique et l'autre, la formation aux disciplines d'enseignement. l'Universit de Moncton, cette rforme a eu pour effet d'ajouter une anne de formation dans tous nos programmes de premier cycle. Le baccalaurat en ducation de quatre ans est devenu un programme conjoint et intgr de cinq ans offert en troite collaboration avec d'autres facults (Arts et sciences sociales, Sciences, Ingnierie et Sant et services communautaires). Ces nouveaux programmes comportent environ trois annes d'tude en ducation dans les programmes de formation l'enseignement primaire et deux annes dans les programmes de formation l'enseignement au secondaire. Le programme postbaccalaurat d'un an en ducation est maintenant devenu un programme de deux ans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".