A Study On The Different Paradigm Of Bodo People Of Aminkata Village In Gossaigaon Block Of Kokrajhar In Assam, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bodos are one of the major ethnic communities that settled early in the Assam state of northeastern India. Their custom, food habits, religion, faith, use of herbal medicines dresses, etc. are different from other people live in that state. They are rich in tribal culture. Bodo people in Bodoland Territorial Region ( Eartswhile BTC) speak the Bodo (Boro) language which is not the same as the Assamese language. This language has Tibeto-Burmese origins and now it has become one of the official languages of Assam. The language has also an important affinity with the Sino-Tibetan language family which is now recognized as one of the Twenty-two scheduled languages in the Indian constitution. Bodo Sahitya Sabha, being an important literary organization has been working hard to protect and promote the Bodo culture, language, and literature. As a result, now the language has been recognized as a scheduled language. Bodo is one of the plain tribes living in Assam for a long time with a separate individuality, culture, and language of its own. The present study wants to explore some important dimensions of the Bodo Tribal community of Aminkata village. The village is 13 kilometers away from the Gossaigaon Block office and 30 Kilometres away from the District Head Quarter i.e. Kokrajhar. The village is located in a rural area with mixed and multi-culture and community villages and is well connected both in road and railway connectivity. This paper has emphasized studying the socio-cultural, customs, and livelihood of the people of Aminkata village in a micro-level study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".