MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200708289 · doi:10.1037/cns0000299

Investigating emotion dysregulation and the perseveration- and flow-like characteristics of ADHD hyperfocus in Canadian undergraduate students.

2021· article· en· W3200708289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samantha Ayers-Glassey, Peter D. MacIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMind wandering and attention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerseverationPsychologyEmotional dysregulationClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been referred to as a disorder of dysregulation due to its paradoxical association with hyperfocus: periods of intense concentration, often during interesting tasks. However, existing descriptions and measures of hyperfocus might tap into related constructs like perseveration and/or flow. Furthermore, previous studies have not sufficiently accounted for comorbidities like depression when examining the specificity of hyperfocus to ADHD. Therefore, the present study investigated the relations between hyperfocus, perseveration, and flow from a transdiagnostic emotion dysregulation perspective to facilitate insights into the separate associations between the attentional and emotional components of ADHD and hyperfocus-like experiences. In a nonclinical sample (neither ADHD nor another mental health diagnosis reported, n = 186), the following were examined: (a) the correlation between ADHD symptomatology and emotion dysregulation tendencies, (b) the similarities between hyperfocus, perseveration, and flow measures, and (c) the predictability of phenomena scores by ADHD symptomatology over and above emotion dysregulation tendencies. Then, the scores of 26 clinical participants (i.e., self-reported ADHD with or without comorbidities) and a matched sample of 26 nonclinical participants were compared to examine the clinical specificity of hyperfocus, perseveration, and flow. The results replicated existing findings regarding the clinical specificity of hyperfocus and its relation to ADHD symptomatology. The results also extended the literature by confirming a more perseveration-like approach to the conceptualization and measurement of hyperfocus in the existing literature, although ADHD symptomatology accounted for more unique variance in hyperfocus scores than in perseveration scores. Finally, future avenues for research on these topics are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePsychology of Consciousness Theory Research and PracticeSame topicMind wandering and attentionFrench-language works237,207