MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200715340 · doi:10.34024/rnc.2021.v29.11873

Intervenções Terapêuticas na Paraparesia Espástica Tropical na Idade Adulta: uma revisão de literatura

2021· article· pt· W3200715340 on OpenAlexaff
Amanda Rocha Batista, Antônio Cabral Fragoso Neto, Gustavo Henrique Pedrosa Braga Netto, Juliana Marques de Paula Cruz, Karina Luiza Rodrigues Serra, Laís Vanessa Pereira Carneiro, Leonardo Cortes de Aguiar Franco, Luana Cristina Rodrigues de Oliveira Costa, Maria Jakiciane Bezerra Souza, Wagner Gonçalves Horta

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Neurociências · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introdução. A paraparesia espástica, doença causada pelo HTLV-1, é considerada uma complicação grave e incapacitante para o paciente infectado, caracterizando-se como uma doença crônica e progressiva que gera sobretudo um processo inflamatório a nível medular e um enorme impacto no ambiente social da pessoa. Objetivos. Discutir as possibilidades terapêuticas atuais disponíveis para paraparesia espástica tropical em adultos. Método. Revisão sistemática de artigos publicados na plataforma PubMed entre 2015 e 2020. Resultados. Enose-Akahata et al, 2019, relatou que não houve eficácia clínica com o tratamento com Hu-Mik beta 1, apesar de não ter havido progressão da doença durante o tratamento. Sato et al, 2018, demonstrou que o uso de mogamulizumab, diminuiu o número de células infectadas pelo HTLV-1 e os níveis de marcadores inflamatórios, mas os efeitos clínicos precisam ser esclarecidos em pesquisas futuras. Nobre et al, 2018, determinou a diversidade genética do HTLV-1, observando uma taxa de variação baixa em comparação com demais vírus, como o da gripe e da varíola. Matsuo et al, 2018, nota que houve melhora sintomatológica após o tratamento com prosultiamina oral nos pacientes com bexiga hiperativa. Conclusão. Dessa forma, não há tratamento específico e totalmente eficaz, havendo a necessidade de associação de fármacos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista NeurociênciasSame topicT-cell and Retrovirus StudiesFrench-language works237,207