MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3200746739 · doi:10.1002/9781119761655.ch4

The Technological Shift: AI in Big Data and IoT

2021· other· en· W3200746739 on OpenAlexaff
Deepti Sharma, Amandeep Singh, Sanyam Singhal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataInternet of ThingsComputer scienceCloud computingProcess (computing)ProductivityArtificial intelligenceData scienceVolume (thermodynamics)Range (aeronautics)World Wide WebEngineeringData miningOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes have always been a major part of life; we experience changes in our body, thoughts, surroundings, and so do with the technology. Artificial Intelligence (AI)–based products brought a revolution in the modern world, making a global impact on technology. This technology not only gave life to a machine but also imparted emotions into it. Whereas, when AI connects with Internet of Things (IoT), it enabled us to operate the machines remotely. During the entire communication process, a huge volume of data chunks is transferred to the cloud so that machines can communicate more efficiently. In this chapter, we will discuss the present scenario of AI in Big Data and the IoT. The languages are utilized in NLP and ANN and their algorithms to predict the best possible results in an optimized manner. We look deeper into IoT modifications which will enhance the properties of the system and its contribution in longer productivity. The major objective of this chapter is to dig deeper into a broad range of applications which can be consumed by AI and ML technology, outcomes of these modifications by keeping economic factors into account, and to have a predictive analysis of the AI systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207