A Diversified Machine Learning Strategy for Predicting and Understanding Molecular Melting Points
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability to predict multi-molecule processes, using only knowledge of single molecule structure, stands as a grand challenge for molecular modeling. Methods capable of predicting melting points (MP) solely from chemical structure represent a canonical example, and are highly desirable in many crucial industrial applications. In this work, we explore a data-driven approach utilizing machine learning (ML) techniques to predict and understand the MP of molecules. Several experimental databases are aggregated from the literature to design a low-bias dataset that includes 3D structural and quantum-chemical properties. Using experimental and polymorph-induced uncertainties, we derive a tenable lower limit for MP prediction accuracy, and apply graph neural networks and Gaussian processes to predict MP competitive with these error bounds. To further understand how MP correlates with molecular structure, we employ several semi-supervised and unsupervised ML techniques. First, we use unsupervised clustering methods to identify classes of molecules, their common fragments, and expected errors for each data set. We then build molecular geometric spaces shaped by MP with a semi-supervised variational autoencoder and graph embedding spaces, and apply graph attribution methods to highlight atom-level contributions to MP within the datasets. Overall, this work serves as a case study of how to employ a diversified ML toolkit to predict and understand correlations between molecular structures and thermophysical properties of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".