Differences in Migration Timing along the Midcontinental Flyway in Sanderling (Calidris alba) from Three Gulf of Mexico Staging Areas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although there is a clear link between early arrival on the breeding grounds and fitness in migratory birds, how winter and staging site use influence the timing of migration events prior to arrival at breeding areas is not well established. Therefore, there is a need to characterize the migration phenology of long-distance migratory birds. This study investigated the northbound migration timing of Sanderlings (Calidris alba) along the Central and Mississippi Flyways (i.e., the ‘Midcontinental Flyway’). Between 2015 and 2017, coded nanotags were attached to 120 Sanderlings in three staging areas in the USA portion of the Gulf of Mexico: North Padre and Bolivar Flats, Texas and sites in Louisiana. Individuals were then tracked northward using the Motus Wildlife Tracking System. Sanderling detections in more northern latitudes on northward migration were primarily in Saskatchewan (94%; n = 33), with only two individuals detected along the Atlantic coast. Sanderlings trapped in North Padre arrived later in Saskatchewan than individuals trapped in Bolivar Flats and Louisiana. Additionally, there was a negative association between Saskatchewan arrival timing and staging duration, such that later-arriving individuals from North Padre had significantly shorter staging durations and consequently departed from Saskatchewan at the same time as individuals originating from Bolivar Flats and Louisiana. These results provide new insight into the migration schedule of a declining long-distance migratory shorebird species and show how departure and arrival timing are linked across disparate staging sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".