Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oh, Maria. “Pre-service Teacher A’s and B’s English Learning Motivation and L2 Identity.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 43.1 (2017): 293-316. The purpose of this study is to understand elementary pre-service teacher A's and B's English learning motivation and L2 identity embedded in English learning experience. The participants were two of 49 primary pre-service teachers who took 'English Teaching Methodology' in Spring and Fall 2015 at J teachers' college. In 2016, A and B were invited to the study because A was active and B was not while taking the class. They were interviewed three times in January and February and two times in December at a researcher's office individually about their life-long English learning experience. The following study results emerged: (1) A had a wonderful time with his uncle's family while learning English for two years at a Canadian primary school. At secondary and tertiary schools, he learned English to prepare for his English subject tests or Korean SAT(Scholastic Aptitude Test). He also enjoyed watching English TV dramas and doing SNS activities with his Canadian friends; (2) A's ideal L2 self was developed while learning English in Canada with his Canadian friends and learning test-oriented-English in Korea mainly because of his wonderful memory of Canadian primary school days; (3) Most of B's English learning was based on stress because he felt he had no choice while he had to read many highly-advanced Economics books at secondary school days with his private tutor; (4) B's ought-to L2 self was developed because he felt he was doomed to learn “NOGADA-English(노가다영어)” as one of the Koreans who need English for better future. Based on the study results, suggestions are made to develop theories and practice of Korean students' English learning motivation and L2 identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".